Tuesday, October 06, 2009

India: Where is it going?

Written by Umar Shahid in Sialkot,
Pakistan Monday, 05 October 2009

History never repeats itself in exactly the same manner. Whenever it does repeat, it always does so on a higher plane. Ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall, they have been manufacturing a new history, fabricating it on a colossal scale. The media and the dominant intelligentsia wish to impose on the psychology of the masses the idea that this system is the final destiny of humankind, or as Francis Fukuyama put it, this is the "end of history". This idea has been propagated by the bourgeois means of communication and a so-called "public opinion" has been created around it by the ruling elites.

Indian Social Conditions and the Myth of “Progress”

Views about the progress of India range from the pollyannaish "India Shining" to the messianically-distorted view of India's Maoists who continue to see India as a "semi-feudal, semi-colonial" nation. The past neo-liberal policies of the Congress-led UPA alliance have only benefitted the upper classes of Indian society.

A large number of Indians live in appalling conditions, like in this slum in Bombay near a dump yard. Photo by mckaysavage on flickr.

The widening gap between rich and poor is growing at an alarming high rate. The 'State of World Population 2008' report, prepared by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), shows that India lags behind its neighbours also in terms of life expectancy. Indian males have a life expectancy of 63.3 years and women of 66.6 years. More than half of India’s women are classed as anaemic, which means that capitalism is daily damaging their very bodies.

As India “progresses”, more people fall into vicious circle of poverty. 230 million people are undernourished and 40 per cent of children under three years of age are underweight. The slums are increasing at a drastic rate on outskirts of Mumbai, Bangalore and other cities otherwise considered as “modern”.

For the past four decades, the child male to female sex ratio statistics in the 0-6 age group reveals a continuous decline. The census figures illustrate that it is in some of the richer states of the country where the problem is most acute and these states include the Punjab which had only 798 girls (per 1,000 boys), Haryana 819, Delhi 868 and Gujarat 883 girls per 1,000 boys in the 2001 Census. Similarly according to a United Nations survey conducted in 2007, an estimated 2,000 unborn girls are illegally aborted every day in India.

There is always money to be made out of poverty; and the capitalists are so cruel that they are now selling poverty in order to maximize their profits. Recently, the Oscar winner movie “Slumdog Millionaire” broke box-office records by propagating the slum poverty and projecting it to world. It was a farce with the suffering, pain and miseries of the poor on display.

The promises of the ruling politicians and their policies have brought nothing but increasing despair among the poor and more people are falling into the death trap of poverty. Now about 78 % of the population spends less than Rs. 20 a day, while the wage rate of workers in the organized industrial sector is among the lowest in the world.

There was a projection of high growth rate of the Indian economy in the past, but 40 percent of its people continue to merely subsist on less than a dollar a day and children are denied basic education. The number of Indians with a higher education is a mere seven percent. But this only one side of the picture: now a large part of the rich in the world are from India. People like Laxmi Mittal, Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani, etc., are from India. Mukesh Ambai who lost $28.2 billion gambling on the Stock Exchange is still India’s richest person with $20.8 billion.

Now that economic turmoil has hit the world, the rich continue to enjoy a life of luxury while the masses suffer even more. The bailouts at the expense of public money are being carried out to maintain the status quo of the rich and protecting them from falling into the mass of poor. From the owners of multinational companies to bureaucrats, they are all enjoying the luxuries during the downturn at the expense of taxpayers’ money.

And as the suffering of the masses gets worse, the luxuries of the rich are ever growing. Recently, an airship “Air Force One”, worth Rs 2450 million, was purchased and included in the Indian Air Force. Yes, there is money for such luxuries, bailouts and the buying of weapons, but there is no money for the ordinary public.

For the 2009-10 fiscal budget India's defence expenditure increased by 10 %, which adds up to Rs.1,056 billion ($26.5 billion) for buying military hardware in order to kill people. Also Rs.33 billion have been allocated to the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) in order to find new ways of spreading destruction and killing people. However, for the Social Services, such as Health, Education and the broadcasting services, only Rs. 302730 Millions have been allocated.

The agrarian question has not yet been solved and farmers continue to commit suicide and woman sell their bodies, children and even parts of their bodies, just to be able to eat bread & butter twice a day. According to a report by the National Crime Records Bureau, as many as 16,632 farmers, including 2,369 women, killed themselves in the year2007, constituting 14.4% of the total number of suicides in the country. That means an average of 46 farmers commit suicide every day in India and if we take data for the past decade, the farmer suicides in the country since 1997 now total 182,936. This is what we find in the annual report of the NCRB, although the actual figures may be even higher.

A country rich in natural resources, skilled manpower and with huge potential for growth is condemned by this horny capitalism to be a failed society, a failed state. It is a tragedy created by the system, which has one motive, to increase their rate of profits at the cost of human life.

India, the world’s largest food grain producer, also has the world’s largest hungry population -- over 200 million. It ranks a poor 66th among 88 developing and transitional countries according to the 2008 Global Hunger Index (GHI-2008) report released by the Washington-based International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Recently, in some parts of India people faced drought-like conditions on the basis that there were no food grains available for them. Three crore [30 million] tonnes of food grains lie in the godowns [Indian warehouses] but the suppliers are not releasing enough onto the market in order to maintain a profitable price. They have created an artificial shortage so that supply is reduced and thus prices go up.

Uneven and Combined Development

The current crisis of India is also rooted in the peculiar development of its capitalism. The dream of capitalism on a classical basis in India is still a dream. But now this dream is more painful for the masses because they are now suffering even more. Capitalism has failed to fulfil any of its historical duties, such as solving the national question, the separation of religion from state, etc. Hence, what we see is that the two different “phases” are combined into one.

Throughout its history, capitalism has absorbed one country after another into its orbit; and in doing so it increased their dependence upon one another. But during this process of interdependence it does not mean that they have followed the same paths; in each part of world the evolution of capitalism has separate characteristics. In this process they drew countries closer together economically and yet with profound differences among them. Their national development in many respects did not proceed along parallel lines, but at angles to each other, and sometimes even at right angles.

Historically, the Indian bourgeoisie came late into the world capitalism. The period after the Second World War was one when capitalism had already entered its highest stage of “Imperialism”. Hence, the development of Indian capitalism came about under the law of “uneven and combined development”. The law of uneven and combined development asserts that once the world market has swallowed up all countries in the world, these come under the direct domination of finance capital.

Thus, now the world has already been divided into major imperialist blocks, and it is impossible for any backward nation to follow the “evolutionary” path. Once imperialism has been shaped, the wealth and power of the great powers is maintained only by the continued exploitation and misery of the former colonies. The dominance of international financial capital has added fuel to the strength of the monopolies of developed nation. And in their search for sources of cheap labour and raw materials, the imperialist powers distort and stunt the development of culture in the former colonies. The misery of these backward nations is on the other hand a source of advancement for the developed nations.

In India we see the same phenomenon. Indian capitalism is so weak that it has to rely on the financial capital of imperialism. And now that finance capital has penetrated even more into the backward nations, the Indian bourgeois are the slaves of imperialism and thus they cannot wage any independent anti-imperialist struggle.

In Trotsky's words:

“Unevenness, the most general law of the historic process, reveals itself most sharply and complexly in the destiny of the backward countries. Under the whip of external necessity their backward culture is compelled to make leaps. From the universal law of unevenness thus derives another law which, for the lack of a better name, we may call the law of combined development – by which we mean a drawing together of the different stages of the journey, a combining of the separate steps, an amalgam of archaic with more contemporary forms. Without this law, to be taken of course, in its whole material content, it is impossible to understand the history of Russia, and indeed of any country of the second, third or tenth cultural class.” (Trotsky, The History of the Russian Revolution, volume 1, chapter I, Peculiarities of Russia’s Development.)

Crisis of Leadership

In India all the parties ‑ with different labels of left, right, nationalist or centrist ‑ have the same economic programme. Their programme is based on the idea of building a strong national state through foreign direct investment. The Indian market, as a source of cheap labour and favourable conditions for the capitalists, has attracted the multinationals who seek a greater degree of exploitation and thus greater profits.

Now, however, we see that capitalism is a “failed system” for the whole of humankind, as it has entered into a blind alley. It cannot deliver anything other than destruction, pain and misery to the billions of ordinary people worldwide.

Unfortunately, even the Communist Parties have adopted an outlook based on the idea that the market dominates. Photo by souravdas on flickr.

Unfortunately, even the Communist Parties have adopted an outlook based on the idea that the market dominates. They in fact abandoned the genuine ideas of Marxism long ago, preferring to adopt the “two-stage” policy. This outdated theory, which was pursued by the Russian bureaucracy in order to save its own privileges, led to the defeat of many revolutions around the world. The bureaucracy choked the essence of what is a revolutionary organization, and at the same time wasted the revolutionary potential of workers, leading to many bloody defeats. These bloody defeats of the workers’ movements ushered in counter-revolutionary movements from that of Hitler to that of Suharto. Generations have had to pay for the crimes of the Stalinist leaders.

In the recent elections in India we saw how the communist parties paid for their past policies. They have attempted to carry out policies within the confines of capitalism. This means they have not been able to carry out policies in the interests of the workers and peasants. The Indian bourgeois media presented the election results as representing a move away from the left. In reality, the reason for their defeat is to be found in the fact that the leaders of the communist parties did not present a programme in any way fundamentally different from that of Congress. Indeed, the only real difference was on the labels. But this should not surprise us, as under the capitalism there is no real freedom, no genuine democracy and no welfare for the overwhelming majority of the people. As Lenin in his speech to the First Congress of the Communist International put it, “The workers know perfectly well, too, that even in the most democratic bourgeois republic 'freedom of assembly' is a hollow phrase, for the rich have the best public and private buildings at their disposal, and enough leisure to assemble at meetings, which are protected by the bourgeois machine of power. The rural and urban workers and the small peasants – the overwhelming majority of the population – are denied all these things. As long as that state of affairs prevails, 'equality', i.e., 'pure democracy', is a fraud.” (Theses on bourgeois democracy and the dictatorship of the proletariat,, 4 March 1919)

What Next?

In the recent past, the boom benefited only a small minority. Now, when we are in recession and facing economical turmoil, the rich continue to enjoy the luxuries of life while the poor have to labour to guarantee the rich their luxuries. The coming period will be characterised by dramatic and sudden turns.

Marx once remarked “Revolutions are the locomotives of history”, and the present conditions in India are preparing the revolution of the future. Sooner or later Congress will stand exposed in the eyes of the masses and more avenues will open for the Marxists of India. Trotsky is now being read in India and people are looking for a solution. The penetration of Trotskyist ideas in Indian society is a symptom that the people and even genuine rank and file workers in the Communist parties are looking for a way out. They have experienced the Communist parties in government, and from this they are beginning to draw conclusions. They seek a way out on the left and that can only be found in the ideas of Trotsky. However, as internationalists we understand that the destiny of the Indian proletariat is inextricably tied up with that of the proletariat in the neighbouring countries, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. The whole South Asian subcontinent is burning and from Islamabad to Dhaka, Calcutta to Katmandu, everywhere frustration and anger are palpable. The only way forward in such conditions is the Socialist Revolution! Only through such a revolution can the scourge of poverty be removed. The wealth is there, but it is in the wrong hands. Forward to a Socialist Federation of South Asia!



Anonymous said...

India's economic problems have naught to do with capitalism and everything to do with population. Why Marxists try and demonize capitalism and sell "resentment" as a cure (and not just a stop-gap measure) for what ails them instead of adressing the "root cause" should be labelled a crime against humanity, unless getting the Indians to either begin killing one another or attacking their neighbors can be now be considered a progressive and an "humane" cure for the population problem. Malthus ("Essay on the Population" laid out the iron-clad relationship between poverty and population centuries ago. Why Marxists continue to pretend that "capitalism" and not "population" lies at the root of all poverty is beyond me.

India has subconsciously recognized the root of her problem in her skewed infant sex selection demographics. But killing off her more "fertile" members is not the humane answer to what ails her. An across the board reduction in population is necessary... a strictly enforced one-child policy that gives up all superfluous children to emigration is the only long-term solution.

With Europe's declining birth rates, perhaps there's a lifeboat on the horizon for India's "unfortunate" second borns. But if I were an Indian, I wouldn't depend upon it. After all, the hallmark of all "third world" nations is an out-of-control human population. And in this day and age, that's 2/3 of the globe.

Machiavelli noted that in olden times, a country experiencing a population problem would likely reach a critical level of poverty, after which one-third of it's population would conquer new territories whilst the remaining 2/3's redistributed the "mother country." Given Indian and Pakistani hostilities, we could see a repeat of that ancient trend as neither country has it's pop;ulation problem under control. Ixion's wheel seems fated to spin at least "one more revolution"...

Ducky's here said...

Yeah, Farmer, the damn poor insist on having children. So there you have the easy scapegoat.

The poor population increases and the government finds no way to invest in basic needs even though it has been demonstrated that these services reduce infant mortality and that in turn actually reduces the birth rate since women have fewer children in the first lives.

Meanwhile most of the dough goes to an elite that is off doing their Thorstein Veblen act like good capitalists.

China is having similar problems. Not quite as severe but the disparity is becoming larger.

Anonymous said...

India's problems are its own.

Leave them to it.

Anonymous said...

Roger Wilco, anon.

2nd Portly Gentleman: What may we put you down for, sir?

Scrooge: Nothing, sir.

1st Portly Gentleman: Ah, you wish to remain anonymous.

Scrooge: I wish to be left alone, sir! That is what I wish! I don't make myself merry at Christmas and I cannot afford to make idle people merry. I have been forced to support the establishments I have mentioned through taxation and God knows they cost more than they're worth. Those who are badly off must go there.

2nd Portly Gentleman: Many would rather die than go there.

Scrooge: If they'd rather die, then they had better do it and decrease the surplus population. Good night, gentlemen.
[walks away, then turns back]

Scrooge: Humbug!

SecondComingOfBast said...

Yeah, Ducky, China never had any problems whatsoever until they started to move towards capitalism. Up until then, they were all just one big happy collective family, huh?

Overpopulation is a major cause of most of India's problems, but there are other problems as well.

Lack of basic services, disease, ignorance, poverty, a still lagging development, and finally, a mired in the past cultural outlook that confers punishment or reward based on mere accident of birth. Being born in India is like being in a lottery against your will. The odds of winning might be relatively higher than in other kinds of lotteries, but those odds are still remarkable stacked against you.

And then there's the rampant corruption that exists nearly unchecked, and permeates all levels of society.

Capitalism Indian style probably does exacerbate some or all of these problems, but it is not the root or main cause of them.

The main cause of the problem is a lack of empowerment of the people.

No society can function well in any regard when only a small percent of the population controls its culture, it's economics, it's political life, and it's overall destiny. As long as that situation prevails in India, or anywhere else, what you will have is a dysfunctional society.

Any kind of political or economic system under those kinds of conditions is irrelevant window dressing, a meaningless facade that will serve to benefit the few at the expense of the many. That will remain true, regardless of whether that system is capitalism, socialism, or some ungodly hybrid of the two.

Empower the people to choose, and see what they decide. Good luck trying to talk them into giving up property rights, or any opportunity to "strike it rich". You'll have better luck convincing them to engage in genital self-mutilation to control population growth.

India is a growing, developing country. They are of course experiencing the same kinds of growing pains any such nation will experience. They are not going to engage in any kind of system that perpetuates the notion they would be better off going backwards, not forwards, and I'm afraid that is exactly what the author here is trying to sell them, regardless of the package he wraps it in.

You might convince such people to put the brakes on development, depending on how you go about it, but you won't talk them into going backwards or standing still for long.

My advice to socialists is to concentrate on some country where there has been no advancement or growth, and where the people are hopelessly mired in a system that offers them absolutely no other way out.

It shouldn't be that hard to pick one out, once you exclude the ninety nine point nine percent of them that are already socialist to one or another degree.

Anonymous said...

Renegade eye:

I'm not sure what certain words you used mean, at least not in the way you have used them.

Capitalism, Imperialism, Bourgeois, Proletariate, Socialism, and Internationalist

I thought Capitalism is an economic system.

Imperialism: No idea.

Bourgeois and Proletariate are noble and peasant classes though which is which I don't know. America has neither (I think).

Socialism I thought was a system of goverment-not economics.

Internationalist: No Idea.

Frank Partisan said...

FJ: China has more growth because of what's left of their former nationalized economy, connected to the world market.

You have a soft spot for the Maoist population control methods.

India needs to nationalize the commanding heights of industry, under workers control.

Ducky: I think understanding China and India are vital. China created the world's largest working class. That sowed the seeds of its own destruction.

Pagan: China had a deformed state to start. Its inspiration was Stalinist Russia, not the socialism of Lenin and Trotsky. It was a peasant led revolution, a symptom of doom from the start.

Because of its nationalized economy, its transition to capitalism worked better than Russia. They didn't allow shock treatment. They didn't allow the US to flood it with cheap goods. Instead they were smartly protectionist.

Anonymous: I'm not going to do a dictionary thing.

Capitalism is an economic system. Because it's unplanned, the government can be from democratic to fascist.

I'm not going to define everything. Keep reading this blog. I'm precise when I use terminology.

Anonymous said...

You have a soft spot for the Maoist population control methods.

I get it from Plato. The population of the State of Magnesia must be kept at 5040 citizens. Otherwise, communism will NEVER work. You won't be able to divide things up equally.

Anonymous said...

btw - W/O the practice of syssitia, Socialism is doomed to failure as well.

Noni said...

Trotskyist ripple in india, plz visit new wave

(i post something related to this in my blog)

Frank Partisan said...

Noni: Thank you for the link.

That group's position on Honduras, is quite sectarian, and unrealistic.

FJ: You're mistaking utopian socialism for Marxism. Marx fought bitterly against the idea of everyone getting the same.

Anonymous said...

He may have fought bitterly against the idea, but the idea is hard-wired into the human brain. Besides, and inequalities which might develop under the "practical practice of communism would require it's participants to be endowed with the "tolerant" virtue of temperance. Good luck w/that. Only a practice like syssitia can impart to a socialist/ communist community such a virtue. Or was Pavlov a fraud, too?

Ludovico, we hardly knew ye.

Oh, but your dystopia isn't going to have ANY classes... lol!

Plato, "Republic"

True, I replied, but there is more coming; I have only told you half. Citizens, we shall say to them in our tale, you are brothers, yet God has framed you differently. Some of you have the power of command, and in the composition of these he has mingled gold, wherefore also they have the greatest honour; others he has made of silver, to be
auxillaries; others again who are to be husbandmen and craftsmen he has composed of brass and iron; and the species will generally be preserved in the children. But as all are of the same original stock, a golden parent will sometimes have a silver son, or a silver parent a golden son. And God proclaims as a first principle to the rulers, and above all else, that there is nothing which should so anxiously guard, or of which they are to be such good guardians, as of the purity of the race. They should observe what elements mingle in their off spring; for if the son of a golden or silver parent has an admixture of brass and iron, then nature orders a transposition of ranks, and the eye of the ruler must not be pitiful towards the child because he has to descend in the scale and become a husbandman or artisan, just as there may be sons of artisans who having an admixture of gold or silver in them are raised to honour, and become guardians or auxiliaries. For an oracle says that when a man of brass or iron guards the State, it will be destroyed. Such is the tale; is there any possibility of making our citizens believe in it?

The New Communist Men are ALL made of IRON!

Taxation services india said...

With large population, there are a lot of problems with India, but still India is progressing continually.

dinoibo said...

Really trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading
Sesli sohbet Sesli chat
Seslisohbet Seslichat
Sesli sohbet siteleri Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli Chat
Sohbet Sesli siteler
Sohbet siteleri Chat siteleri
Sohbet merkezi chat merkezi
Sesli merkezi sesli Sohbet merkezi
Sesli chat merkezi Sohbetmerkezi
Sesli Sohbet Sesli Chat
SesliSohbet Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli sohbet siteleri SesliChat
Sesli Sesli siteler
Seslimuhabbet sesli muhabbet
sesli sohbet sesli chat siteleri
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslisohbet seslichat
seslikent sesli kent
sesli sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli chat sesli chat siteleri
seslisohbet seslichat