Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Hugo Chavez To Bush43: Go Home

This is from Amy Goodman's daily news show, produced by Pacifica Radio Democracy Now, a leftist daily news show. I recommend listening to it, if you haven't before.


As President Bush tours Latin America, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez spoke before tens of thousands at an anti-imperialist rally in Argentina of Friday. We broadcast excerpts of Chavez's stinging attack on Bush who was in Uruguay, just thirty miles away across the River Plate.

President Bush has arrived in Guatemala for the second-to-last stop of his five-nation tour of Latin America. He is meeting with Guatemalan President Oscar Berger for talks expected to be dominated by immigration and free trade issues.
Bush's visit to the region has been marked by mass protests and marches. In Brazil on Thursday, thirty thousand people took to the streets. The next day in Uruguay, some six thousand marched in the capital of Montevideo. In Bogota, police made one hundred twenty arrests when five thousand protesters marched just one mile from where Bush held talks with Colombian president Alvaro Uribe. Bush will travel to Mexico later today for the last leg of his tour.

While many analysts agree the president's trip is part of an effort to gain back influence in the region, the White House has sought to portray the tour as part of a humanitarian effort to address issues of poverty. Last week in Washington, President Bush spoke before the US Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.

President Bush speaking in Washington last week. In addition to the mass protests to his presence in the region, Bush has been dogged by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez who is on a counter-tour of Latin America at the same time. In fact, Chavez has practically shadowed Bush since the beginning of his trip. When Bush was in Uruguay Friday, Chavez held a massive rally in neighboring Argentina. When Bush flew to Colombia, Chavez addressed thousands in Bolivia. While Bush is in Guatemala, Chavez is again close by in neighboring Nicaragua.
During a mass rally in Buenos Aires on Friday, the Venezuelan president launched a stinging attack on Bush who was in Uruguay, just thirty miles away across the River Plate.

AMY GOODMAN: President Bush has arrived in Guatemala for the second-to-last stop of his five-nation tour of Latin America. He is meeting with Guatemalan President Oscar Berger for talks expected to be dominated by immigration and free trade.

Bush's visit to the region has been marked by mass protest and marches. In Brazil Thursday, 30,000 people took to the streets. The next day in Uruguay, some 6,000 marched in the capital of Montevideo. In Bogota, police made 120 arrests when 5,000 protesters marched just one mile from where Bush held talks with the Colombian President Alvaro Uribe. Bush will travel to Mexico later today for the last leg of his tour.

While many analysts agree the President's trip is part of an effort to gain back influence in the region, the White House has sought to portray the tour as part of a humanitarian effort to address issues of poverty. Last week in Washington, President Bush spoke before the US Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: You know, not far from the White House, there’s a statue of the great liberator Simon Bolivar. He’s often compared to George Washington -- Jorge W. Like Washington, he was a general who fought for the right of his people to govern themselves. Like Washington, he succeeded in defeating a much stronger colonial power. And like Washington, he belongs to all of us who love liberty. One Latin American diplomat had put it this way: “Neither Washington nor Bolivar was destined to have children of their own, so that we Americans might call ourselves their children.”

We are the sons and daughters of this struggle, and it is our mission to complete the revolution they began on our two continents. The millions across our hemisphere who every day suffer the degradations of poverty and hunger have a right to be impatient. And I'm going to make them this pledge: The goal of this great country, the goal of a country full of generous people, is an Americas where the dignity of every person is respected, where all find room at the table, and where opportunity reaches into every village and every home. By extending the blessings of liberty to the least among us, we will fulfill the destiny of this new world and set a shining example for others. Que Dios les bendiga.


AMY GOODMAN: President Bush, speaking in Washington last week. In addition to the mass protests to his presence in the region, Bush has been dogged by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who’s on a counter-tour of Latin America at the same time. In fact, Chavez has practically shadowed Bush since the beginning of his trip. When Bush was in Uruguay on Friday, Chavez held a mass rally in neighboring Argentina. When Bush flew to Colombia, Chavez addressed thousands in Bolivia. When Bush was in Guatemala, Chavez is again close by in neighboring Nicaragua.

Today, we’re going to play an excerpt of one of Chavez's speeches, this at the mass really in Buenos Aires on Friday. The Venezuelan president launched a stinging attack on Bush, who was in Uruguay, just thirty miles away across the River Plate.

PRESIDENT HUGO CHAVEZ: [translated] On the other side of the river, that is where that little gentleman of the North must be. Let's give him a big boo! Gringo, go home!

I am convinced that our friends in Brasilia and in Montevideo are not going to feel offended, because we would not want to hurt any of our brethren from Uruguay or Brazil. We recognize their sovereignty. We recognize that those governments have the sovereign right to invite the little gentleman of the North, if they so choose.

But Kirchner and I don't need to plan anything to sabotage this visit, because we are witnessing the true political cadaver. The President of the United States is a political cadaver. He doesn't even smell of sulfur anymore. He doesn't even smell of sulfur or brimstone, if you will. No longer. What you smell from him now is the stench of political death. And not long from now, he will turn to dust and disappear. So we don't need to put forth any effort to sabotage the visit of the President of the United States to some countries, sisters countries of Central and South America, of course. We don't need to do that. It's a simple coincidence, the visit of Nestor to Venezuela and our visit here to Buenos Aires.

Well, we nevertheless need to thank that little gentleman that's visiting us, because if he were not here in South America, perhaps this event would not be so well-attended. We have organized this event to say no to the presence of the chief of the empire here in the heroic lands of South America.

The imperial little gentleman that's visiting Latin America today said about seventy-two or forty-eight hours ago in one of his speeches, when he was announcing that he was leaving for Latin America, he compared Simon Bolivar to George Washington. In fact, he even said the ridiculous thing -- and I can't say it's hypocrisy, because it is simply ridiculous, the most ridiculous thing he could say. He said, today we are all children of Washington and Bolivar. That is, he thinks that he is a son of Bolivar. What he is is a son of a -- but I can't say that word here.

So he has said -- he has said -- and you should listen to what he said here -- he said that now is the time to finish the revolution that Washington and Bolivar commenced . How's that for heresy? That is heresy and ignorance, because we have to remember -- and I say this with all due respect to George Washington, who is historically one of the founding fathers of that country -- but we must also remember the differences and how different George Washington and Simon Bolivar were, are and will always be.

George Washington won a war to gain the independence of the North American economic elite from the English empire, and when Washington died, or, rather, after his independence and after having been the president of the United States, after ordering the massacre of the indigenous peoples of North America, after defending slavery, he ended up being a very rich owner of slaves and of a plantation. He was a great landowner. That was George Washington.

Simon Bolivar, however, was born with a silver spoon, and at eight years old his parents died and he inherited a large fortune, together with his brothers, and he inherited haciendas and slaves. Simon Bolivar, when history led him -- and as Karl Marx said, men can make history, but only as far as history allows us to do so -- when history took Bolivar and made him the leader of the independence process in Venezuela, he made that process revolutionary. Simon Bolivar turned over all of his land. He freed all of his slaves, and he turned them into soldiers, and he brought them here. He brought them to Peru and Carabobo, and he worked together with the troops of San Martin to liberate this continent. That is Simon Bolivar.

And Simon Bolivar, having been born with that silver spoon in his mouth, when he died on the Caribbean coast of Colombia, when he died on December 17 in 1830, he was dressed with a shirt of someone else, because he had no clothes. Simon Bolivar is the leader of the revolution of this land. He is the leader of the social revolution, the people's revolution, the historical revolution. George Washington has nothing -- nothing -- to do with this history.

It was in 1823 that James Monroe said, "America for the Americans." And when I say this tonight, I say it because I want to remind you, my brothers of Argentina, of Venezuela and of America, that the presence of the President of the United States in South America represents all of that. He represents that Monroe Doctrine of America for the Americans. Well, we will have to tell him: North America for the North Americans and South America for the South Americans. This is our America.

The President of the United States, that political cadaver -- and when I say political cadaver, he would like to see me as a real cadaver -- I want him to be a political cadaver, and he already is a political cadaver. The President of the United States has the lowest level of credibility and acceptance from his own people. He is the current president of the United States.

It would appear that he doesn't even dare mention my name, because he was asked in Brasilia today in a press conference -- I saw it, I watched it at the hotel -- and the journalist asked him, “It is said that you are here to stop Chavez's movement in South America.” And it looked like he almost had a heart attack when he heard "Chavez," because he actually stuttered a couple of times, and he actually changed the subject. He didn't answer the question. He didn't answer the question at all. So he doesn't even dare.

And I definitely dare to say his name. The President of the United States of North America, George W. Bush, the little gentleman of the North, the political cadaver that is visiting South America, that little gentleman is the president of all the history of the United States, and in the history of the United States, he has the lowest level of approval in his own country. And if we add that to the level of approval that he has in the world, I would think he's in the red now -- negative numbers.
RENEGADE EYE

19 comments:

GraemeAnfinson said...

I watched the program. It appears Chavez has much more knowledge on American history than Bush.

Unsane said...

Good stuff! What I found vastly amusing was Paul Keating calling John Howard a dessicated coconut.

sonia said...

Chavez lecturing Bush on democracy is like Hannibal Lecter lecturing McDonald's on the quality of their burgers.

As long as the Left foolishly supports tyrants like Chavez, flawed leaders like Bush will be ruling the world. You have nobody but yourself to blame for your own stupidity.

beatroot said...

You know, GB and HC need each other. They make each other look like they have a sense of purpose, a mission….a future.

But the facts are rather different. Most of Venezuela’s oil goes to America. America needs the oil. If either went too far and broke off trade then both countries would be in the shit.

So, keep a cynical eye on those two. The rhetoric is just that – hot air.

CB said...

The western left is blind to the tyranny they support from the sidelines. None of them live with it, which can't be understated.

They say that the U.S. has poor. Compared to what? Does anyone on the left care to compare "poverty" in the U.S. to poverty anywhere else in the world?

They say the U.S. exploits "workers." I'm sure the rest of the world would love to be so "exploited."

And then there's Bolivar, Che, Castro, Ortega, Hu Jintao, Kim Jong Il and Chavez. They were/are so for the people...LOL!!!

The revolution will not be televised, because these high minded leftist leaders seized control of the press to make sure of it!

GraemeAnfinson said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
GraemeAnfinson said...

One of Chavez's top officials has been firing prosecutors that don't agree with the party. Or was that Bush?

Aaron A. said...

the "Leftist press,"
flag waving up to and through the Iraq war. Apparently their liberal only on a social scale?

...and as for The revolution will not be televised. I'm afraid you'll have to watch that online.

Exploited workers! I'm sure the 7 year-old in Bangladesh making sure we "roll-back the prices" feels exploited.

The Pagan Temple said...

I watched Chavez's speech on C-Span. He is a master showman, and always amusing, though at the same time somewhat scary. I'm still not sure exactly what to make of him.

Excellent post, Renegade.

troutsky said...

"Little gentleman from the North!" a "political cadaver" "cosmic dust"! C'Mon you HAVE to love it! The CBs and Sonias of the world can't believe a world leader can actually pierce the veil of bullshit spin and say what he thinks without getting a CIA bullet in the head.The truth hurts when youre not used to it, when you live in their world of cliches and boiler plate hyperbole.

CB said...

The 7 year old Bangladeshi's family probably depends on what she earns. But like India, today it is the 7 year old, tomorrow the village is wireless and setting up call centers and programmers for American and European conglomerates.

We're doing web and programming with Vietnamese companies now, paying them next to nothing because India has become to expensive.

clash said...

Credibility of chavez is always a big question, but it has been the same with almost all the leaders on earth.

I am happy that he makes an attempt to speak out.

Who else in the world does that often?

sonia said...

C'Mon you HAVE to love it!

No.

Chavez is just as funny as Idi Amin used to be. But a moment comes when it is no longer funny when the economy is destroyed, and the corpses start pilling up.

Left's blind love affair with bloodthirsty Thirld War dictators continues. But beware, there was no Internet in the 1970's, so all those leftists who were singing (mostly verbal) praises of Idi Amin didn't leave much evidence. Now, your praises of Chavez are well recorded and will be thrown back at you once the shit really hits the fan in Venezuela and true, psychopatic nature of the Chavez regime is revealed.

Then again, if Chavez becomes another George Washington, I will have some crow to eat as well... Believe me, I would much prefer that, for the Venezuelan people's sake...

Tina said...

Like several others here have said, I also don't really know what to make of Chavez except maybe this: Chavez seems to always correctly call it as he sees it when it comes to Bush. Of course, this could simply be a case of it takes one to know one... but time will tell, no?

Puppeteer said...

Comparing Washington to Bolivar is worse than heresy.
But then again, diplomacy never was Bush' forte.

CB said...

Sonia,

I would happily join you eating that dish, but sadly, as you say for the people of Venezuela, that bird won't come anywhere near our plates.

Renegade Eye said...

The closest I've come to liking Idi Amin, was hoping Forrest Whitaker took home the Academy Award. If anything I would blame the left, as well as most of America, for not following African issues closer.

On Sunday we're having a local antiwar activity here in Minneapolis. I will be seeing a friend of mine, who edits "In Defense of Marxism", who just returned from Venezuela.

The Pagan Temple said...

Puppeteer-yeah, you're right, comparing Washington to Bolivar is definitely heresy. Washington was one of history's greatest men, who helped establish a system that, for all it's faults, has grown and prospered and become the envy of the world.

Bolivar established a system which over the years has fragmented and given way to constant bloodbaths and one tin horn dictator after another, with the only all pervasive constant being abject poverty and degradation of the masses for the benefit of a small handful of wealthy elites.

Unfortunately, Bush seems all too sincere to me, as the road he seems to be on is more conducive to the Bolivar than to the Washington legacy.

C deGaulle said...

I'm glad most of you find this so funny.

But what would happen to you if you decided next Friday to go to that wonderful land that Chavez has ``liberated'' and say the same things about him in the streets ?

Within 10 minutes you'd be rotting in a filthy jail for some time I think. At least here I can say anything I want about Bush and I don't have to worry about my fate being in the hands of that ``funny funny man'' Senor Chavez.

What's more I'm never hungry here either.

Who's REALLY laughing at who ?